Many are advancing the idea that pro-life advocacy and rhetoric among Republican politicians and presidential candidates may have led the Colorado shooter to target a Planned Parenthood. Despite the lack of compelling evidence to support this assertion, is it even justifiable to characterize the words of one side in a national political debate as being responsible for the criminal acts of one man? Clearly this does not meet the legal definition of incitement, but does merely the allegation of a linkage cause a squelching of robust political debate on a neuralgic topic? Watch this segment from MediaBuzz today for an engaging discussion. Is it advisable to lay the Colorado shootings at the feet of politicians who support the right to life?
You may also like
Obama’s New World Disorder
The end of the Cold War provided an opportunity for a reshuffling of historic alliances and power...
Why MSM and Democrats are revolting against Trump
Have the media accepted the will of the American people yet? I joined Lou Dobbs and Byron York on...
Supreme Court to hear oral arguments on travel ban case
The federal government’s primary job is to keep the nation safe. Under the Constitution, the...
SCOTUS Blocks House Democrats from Trump Tax Records
The continuing saga of Trump’s tax returns . . . . . The SCOTUS decision was a clear win for...
