Many are advancing the idea that pro-life advocacy and rhetoric among Republican politicians and presidential candidates may have led the Colorado shooter to target a Planned Parenthood. Despite the lack of compelling evidence to support this assertion, is it even justifiable to characterize the words of one side in a national political debate as being responsible for the criminal acts of one man? Clearly this does not meet the legal definition of incitement, but does merely the allegation of a linkage cause a squelching of robust political debate on a neuralgic topic? Watch this segment from MediaBuzz today for an engaging discussion. Is it advisable to lay the Colorado shootings at the feet of politicians who support the right to life?
You may also like
My Virtual 60-Foot Sailboat
A neighbor kindly introduced me to another neighbor I had not yet met. After hearing where I live...
Interview with Cam Edwards at CPAC 2020: Virginia Gun Control Update
At CPAC 2020, Gayle Trotter interviewed Cam Edwards, Second Amendment journalist and author. WATCH:...
Tweeting the Inner Ring
The desire to be a part of the “inner ring” and the “terror of being left outside” is a chief...
Investigation of Kavanaugh is a Delay Tactic
I was on Michael Smerconish’s show on CNN to discuss the Kavanaugh hearings: SMERCONISH: Do you...
