Many are advancing the idea that pro-life advocacy and rhetoric among Republican politicians and presidential candidates may have led the Colorado shooter to target a Planned Parenthood. Despite the lack of compelling evidence to support this assertion, is it even justifiable to characterize the words of one side in a national political debate as being responsible for the criminal acts of one man? Clearly this does not meet the legal definition of incitement, but does merely the allegation of a linkage cause a squelching of robust political debate on a neuralgic topic? Watch this segment from MediaBuzz today for an engaging discussion. Is it advisable to lay the Colorado shootings at the feet of politicians who support the right to life?
You may also like
Daily Wrap – Oct 23
Should Donald increase his security in reaction to threats from violent and powerful criminals like...
Democrats wrong on the facts re Medicaid
Beyond the inflammatory “blood money” rhetoric that Sen. Elizabeth Warren should not...
House Democrats are acting like a bunch of children
The business of the U.S. House is suspended as Democrats continue a sit-in over guns. They are...
Interview at CPAC 2020 with Kathy Barnette: Socialism is another form of slavery
At CPAC 2020, Gayle Trotter interviewed Kathy Barnette, author of the book, “Nothing to Lose...
