Many are advancing the idea that pro-life advocacy and rhetoric among Republican politicians and presidential candidates may have led the Colorado shooter to target a Planned Parenthood. Despite the lack of compelling evidence to support this assertion, is it even justifiable to characterize the words of one side in a national political debate as being responsible for the criminal acts of one man? Clearly this does not meet the legal definition of incitement, but does merely the allegation of a linkage cause a squelching of robust political debate on a neuralgic topic? Watch this segment from MediaBuzz today for an engaging discussion. Is it advisable to lay the Colorado shootings at the feet of politicians who support the right to life?
You may also like
Planned Parenthood vs the NRA
According to liberals, the NRA buys off politicians in an effort to push a pro-gun agenda that...
Trump, the W.H.O., and the Democrat/MSM Echo Chamber
President Trump is right to pause funding to the W.H.O. He is standing up for the American people...
Defending Against ISIS in Washington, DC
The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria announced its goal to stage a Paris-style attack in our...
Will the Coronavirus lead to a Big or Small Government? YOU CHOOSE
The pundits predict the coronavirus will lead to bigger and more centralized government. I predict...
