Many are advancing the idea that pro-life advocacy and rhetoric among Republican politicians and presidential candidates may have led the Colorado shooter to target a Planned Parenthood. Despite the lack of compelling evidence to support this assertion, is it even justifiable to characterize the words of one side in a national political debate as being responsible for the criminal acts of one man? Clearly this does not meet the legal definition of incitement, but does merely the allegation of a linkage cause a squelching of robust political debate on a neuralgic topic? Watch this segment from MediaBuzz today for an engaging discussion. Is it advisable to lay the Colorado shootings at the feet of politicians who support the right to life?
You may also like
Media trumpet Bannon’s ouster
Did the left and the media succeed at defeating Steve Bannon with his departure from the White...
Smidgen of Corruption in Christine O’Donnell IRS Case
Citizens who flout the Internal Revenue Service face the prospect of jail, but when the IRS flouts...
Taxes on Bullets? They’re trying to do everything to take away our Second Amendment Rights
I was on Carl Higbie’s show on Newsmax along with Cam Edwards where we talked about the...
Trump says Twitter is ‘shadow banning’ Republicans
The high priests of groupthink create echo chambers of perceived wisdom and then they are shocked...
